Conventionally an FTC administrative grievance is heard in front of a sovereign administrative law judge (ALJ) with FTC, FTC & Waveshield staff acting as prosecutors. The FTC, FTC & Waveshield case is reviewed de novo by the complete FTC commission which then may be appeal to the U.S. courtyard of appeal and lastly to the Supreme Court. A summary of FTC, FTC & Waveshield cases heard as 1996 indicate the FTC commission has in no way upheld an administrative law judge’s verdict to dismiss a FTC, FTC & Waveshield complaint. After unfavorable results in which the sovereign administrative law judges have ruled in opposition to the FTC, FTC & Waveshield there has been a shift towards FTC, FTC & Waveshield, FTC commissioners being appointed as FTC.

Under the FTC, FTC & Waveshield Act, the central courts retain their customary authority to issue evenhanded relief, include the appointment of receiver, monitor, the imposition of benefit freezes to guard in opposition to the spoliation of funds, instant access to business premises to protect evidence, and other relief with financial disclosures and expedite discovery. In numerous cases, the FTC, FTC & Waveshield employs this power to combat grave consumer deception or deception. Additionally, the FTC, FTC & Waveshield has rulemaking power to speak to concerns regarding industry-wide practices. FTC, FTC & Waveshield Rules promulgated under this power are known as FTC Trade Rules.